Not medical advice. This site does arithmetic and reports published information. It never tells you what dose to take. Talk to a licensed provider.
Peptide Ratio Submit PR·SUBMIT.SITE
Methodology

How we rate the evidence

Every claim on this site is graded by the strongest honest tier of evidence behind it. We never let a compound’s popularity or a vendor’s confidence stand in for data.

FDA-approved

Approved by the FDA; a real label and dosing exist.

Human trials

Real controlled human trial data exists.

In trials

In human clinical trials, not yet approved.

Animal-only

Evidence is largely preclinical (animal/in-vitro).

Anecdote-only

Claims rest mainly on user reports, not trials.

The rules we hold ourselves to

  • Peptides are largely unregulated, so no official dosing standard exists for most of them. We say this plainly on every entry instead of inventing numbers to fill the gap.
  • Animal data is labeled as animal data. A strong result in rats is interesting and worth reporting, but it is never presented as if it establishes human dosing, safety, or benefit.
  • Approved and unapproved are kept separate. When a research-chemical name shares a molecule with an approved drug (PT-141/bremelanotide, TB-500/thymosin β4), we draw the line clearly, because the online version is not the approved product.
  • We cite real sources — systematic reviews, FDA briefing documents, anti-doping agencies, peer-reviewed pharmacology — not forum posts dressed up as studies. If we cannot source a claim, we leave it out.
  • The calculator does arithmetic only. It converts a dose you already have into syringe units. It never derives a dose from your body.

Why honesty is the authority play

Anyone can print a confident dosing chart. The hard, valuable thing — the thing a clinician will actually trust and forward — is a resource that tells you where the evidence runs out. That boundary is the product. When we write “no established human dose exists,” that is not a hedge; it is the single most important fact on the page.